Health Care Ethics Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Health Care Ethics - Essay ExampleRelativism has taken root in the current world society in the sense that an individual is free to commit a wrong deed and easily get away with it. This is as gigantic as he or she can justify his/her actions (Hinderer, chap. 4). A typical example of this scenario is social tolerance towards acts that were strongly condemned in the past. Incidences of social tolerance include homosexuality, the lenient judicial system, pornography, criminal conversation and even fornication. honorable relativism on the other hand refutes the existence of moral absolutes. It dictates neither mor anyy wrong nor morally right deeds do exist. This hypothesis finds it easier to link the right and wrong deeds to social norms. According to Hinderer (Chapter 4), relativism does not qualify as a basis of professional practice and as an honest theory. Ethical relativism undermines the influence of morality as a unifying factor in the society. Ethical relativism does not hol d the account of an absolute right or wrong. A right or a wrong can only be established by use of logic, observation, preferences, emotions, experiences and relevant rules. Most cultures if not all perceive vices such(prenominal) as cheating, lying, murder and stealing as evils of the society thus wrong. Whenever an individual goes against such laws then he or she is punished. Moral absolutes such as the Ten Commandments (Christianity) have no changed since (Hinderer, chap. 4). It is interesting to note that none of them depends on social norms yet they are still true. This is to say that laid muckle rules and doctrines of the various religions find fault in ethical relativism. This theory has also been faulted because considers the right, wrong and the truth as relative. It does not make sense to conclude that veritable things are right on the basis of a school of thought by a group of people. A typical example of this scenario was the slave tack where by as much as it was accep table in the past, the world today does not entertain it. In general, relativism does not provide for absolute ethics. Ethical relativism on the other hand undermines the existence of God according to the various religious systems in the world (Wear, Bono and McEvoy, 10). It should also be understood that this theory is faulted alone because ethical standards and norms keep changing with time. Relativism becomes false on the basis of an individuals affiliation to a particular religious system. Personally, it is false since it does not deal absolute ethical values. On the contrary it is true that many people accept this theory simply because it is not as strict as long as an individual or a group of people can justify a deed, then it is right. This theory offers a comfort zone that is relatively free of condemnation thus an ever increasing following. According to Hinderer (chap. 5), speciesism can be defined as a discriminative gesture by benevolente beings against other species . It can also be defined as the act of putting human beings under privileges and advantages as opposed to animals. As a result, contrasting species have different rights and values. Peter Singers arguments, with respect to whether our treatment of animals is speciesist or not, is valid. The fact that animals too share similar moral status with human means that they should be treated right without discrimination. Cruelty spans from factory farming all the way to laboratory tests carried out using animals.